Modern Compositional Styles

Kevin Puts is a contemporary composer who possesses musical aesthetics and values which exist firmly within the Western classical tradition dating back centuries. His main aim in composition is to tell a story to the audience. His music has programmatic significance and uses the musical language of narrative to, in the composer’s own words, “hold the audience in [his] grip.” However, we live in a time when such composers like Puts, who sit at a piano and write music on paper (or a laptop, all the same) in traditional staff notation are hardly representative of the only type of musicians who write music today. No longer is the stereotypical romantic notion of a composer who scribbles their musical inspiration on a splotchy paper manuscript in the middle of the night the only example of an effective compositional method. With the advent of computer programs known as DAWs (Digital Audio Workstations) — such as Apple’s Logic or Avid’s Pro Tools — and the proliferation of affordable consumer recording equipment, a new compositional method has emerged, one that completely bypasses the need for staff notation and has redefined what it means to translate one’s musical ideas into a form that can be received by others.

The most significant difference between the use of DAWs and the traditional Western classical compositional method of choice for Kevin Puts is how the music is eventually presented to the world. In one case, the composer has complete control of the eventual result of their musical work; with these programs, any combination and manipulation of sound you can imagine can be achieved with computer precision and recreated exactly every time you play the same audio file. They are intended to be handed to performers before they can be heard to the public; they are immediately available for the world to hear time and time again with the same results. On the other hand, with traditional Western classical composition, the notes you write down are specifically destined to be given to another musician, interpreted, performed, and, in Puts’ own words, “have something brought to them that you couldn’t have even imagined when you wrote it”. Also importantly, due to the live aspect of these performances, the result of the musical work will be slightly (if not drastically) different with each reading.

If composers do not pass on the responsibility for the outcome of their music to the interpretation of other musicians, they have more authority over the result of their music, down to the finest detail and nuance. Eric Drott’s article “Fraudulence and the Gift Economy of Music” and Joshua Fineberg’s article “Understanding Music” both discuss the importance, or lack of importance, of a composer’s musical intent when listening to a musical composition, but it is possible, in my view, that a heightened sense of authority over the direct outcome of your musical composition places a greater importance on the composers original musical, emotional, and communicative intentions.

In an age when many compositional methods are available to composers, Kevin Puts’ personal compositional method could be viewed as a conscious choice. He is not alone. Many composers exist today who continue to benefit from the use of traditional techniques of music making. The question then arises: what value does traditional composition hold that has caused it to remain relevant in the modern day. For Puts, this answer may lie in the human aspect he sees in the way that his music is interpreted by other musicians. Puts stated in an interview on his wind band piece “Charm” that he is “much more interested in composing for instruments that he can’t play himself.” While his music has been recorded by some of the greatest performers alive, for him, the moment when the music truly comes to life is during this “handing off” process, which we could assume he doesn’t believe this can happen when you are simply playing your own compositions. On the other hand, on album like In My Room by Jacob Collier, every musical sound was performed by one musician, Collier himself, and mixed to alarming precision with absolute control over the eventual outcome. At the end of the day, both compositional methods share the same musical value of communication. For Puts, the most important thing to remember is that “your music really has to communicate.” Similarly, Collier wants to communicate with his listeners by leaving things in his music for people to find within their own personal emotional framework. He explains: “I can only make music for myself” and it is important for him to aim for “people to then come to my music and find their own stories to tell.”

Meanwhile, we can also observe an important contrast between the two equally relevant composers. Puts, a composer who relinquishes some of the control over his music to the performers who interpret it, is very strict about the indented programmatic purpose of his music, including the images he wishes to portray to his audience. For example, in his operas, he deliberately attempts to paint the story with certain harmonies in order to make the audience feel a certain way about the characters. On the other hand, Collier, a composer with absolute control over his musical product with the help of Logic, the DAW he prefers to use, invites his listeners to find whatever they would like to find in his music.

Chris Beroes-Haigis

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Fineberg, Joshua. “Understanding Music” In Classical Music, Why Bother?: Hearing the World of Contemporary Culture through a Composer’s Ears. New York: Routledge, 2006.

Drott, Eric. “Fraudulence and the Gift Economy of Music” in Journal of Music Theory, 54:1. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University, 2010.

American Composers Forum, “Composer Kevin Puts talks about what he finds fun in composing,” September 11th, 2012, YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5DeiD93RR0

FaceCulture, “Jacob Collier Interview”, YouTube, August 29th, 2017, YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MCx_yBOxtc&t=158s

Unison Media, “Kevin Puts on Silent Night”, October 8th, 2019, YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHs7EfchO_4

3 thoughts on “Modern Compositional Styles

Add yours

  1. It is very interesting to see and understand not only why a composer writes their music, but also how they do so. I would be curious to ask composers why they may choose to use a standard notation software as opposed to a program such as Logic Pro to compose their music. It could certainly be preference, but I also wonder – could it be a result of museum culture as well? Similarly to how some aspects of music have achieved a unique state of antiquity, how would the method(s) of composing fare any different? The jump to the use of DAWs may be a reason, or it could be due to most music being written on staff paper for centuries. I would be curious to discuss this with different composers.

    Like

  2. I find it interesting that the compositional techniques of Puts and Collier seemed to work in both ways. Puts has little control over the outcome of his music and yet somehow got the musicians who performed it to express what he wanted while Collier has absolute control over his outcome but hopes that his audience makes the music personal to themselves. It’s almost as if the outcomes of their compositional techniques were switched.
    I also wonder if Puts were to have the ability to play all the instruments his music called for, would he would ever consider producing his music like Collier has? Performing it himself with absolute control?

    Like

  3. I certainly find it interesting how far we have advanced, in terms of technology. Most musicians have adapted and even welcomed its uses, often times using it as an aid for practice and educational means. However, it still feels odd knowing that composers have moved along and now use technological programs (like Finale) to enter in their works rather than writing them on paper. Perhaps it is ignorant to believe hand-written compositions are superior over ones created on computers. I have heard a few of Collier’s works and find them to be quite different, yet appealing to the ears. Although it is managed through technological means, his compositions are written with careful intent. He is no different than any other composer who wishes to create a piece with particular rhythms, harmonies, and melodies.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Create your website at WordPress.com
Get started
%d bloggers like this: